From: Vincent Broman (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Feb 12 1998 - 20:02:05 EST
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> I cannot think of a single text critic in
> any writing who has suggested that the pericope is genuine.
Hodges and Farstad in the intro to their NT edition
spend some time defending the pericope adulterae as
part of the original text of John.
My impression is: a number of writers have suggested
that while the pericope is not due to John (or Luke)
it still might well derive from a tradition of a real event
in Jesus' life.
Vincent Broman email@example.com +1 619 284 3775
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:03 EDT