From: Edgar Foster (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Apr 07 1998 - 18:42:54 EDT
---"Paul S. Dixon" wrote:
> While the third clause of Jn 1:1c is undoubtedly a qualitative
> about the LOGOS, this does not mean it cannot also be a statement of
> identity (by implication), as I read Carson.
Thank you for confirming my suspicions. :) I will refrain from arguing
with Carson comments. I mainly wanted to know, was he correct? Is his
statement valid? I now have another matter to investigate: can a
qualitative statement imply identity? Back to work.
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:21 EDT