From: Ben Crick (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Sep 04 1998 - 22:54:47 EDT
On Fri 4 Sep 98 (15:31:55), email@example.com wrote:
> Could the repetition be a scribal error or is it emphasis? Not
> knowing Hebrew, is the Hebrew repetitious? FWIW, the Vulgate has it:
> non in abscondito locutus sum in loc terrae tenebroso
> non dixi semini Iacob frustra quaerite me
> ego Dominus loquens iustitiam adnuntians recta
> with no repetition.
Thank you, Cindy. It would appear that the repetition in Gramcord at Isa
45:19 LXX is a dittogram. It happens today as well as in antiquity!
Haplography too. My Biblia Sacra Vulgata downloaded from the Web lacks
Daniel chapters 4 thru 12. Yours too? Mercifully I have an old Bagster
Let us not forget that EGW EIMI is also the normal phrase for "I am....".
I'm making no claims about myself when I use it!
-- Revd Ben Crick, BA CF <firstname.lastname@example.org> 232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK) http://www.cnetwork.co.uk/crick.htm
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:59 EDT