From: John Baima (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Sep 22 1998 - 09:44:17 EDT
At 04:54 PM 9/21/1998 EDT, you wrote:
>In a message dated 9/21/1998 3:09:40 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
><<BTW, one of the things that got me going on all this is the assertion that
>some conditionals "assume the protasis false for the sake of argument."
>This is a nonsensical statement since no inference can be made from a
>negative protasis. Inferences can only be made from a positive protasis or
>a false apodosis.>>
>This may or may not be true. It depends on the falsity of the apodosis.
Okay. What I was referring to (and my thesis is titled, as you know) is
validity. Validity deals with the proper logical construction of an
argument and it has nothing to do with soundness. So, to be more correct,
I'll change my sentence to "Valid inferences can only be made from a
positive protasis or
a false apodosis." The soundness of an argument is, of course, interesting,
but unrelated to validity.
Silver Mountain Software 1029 Tanglewood Dr, Cedar Hill TX 75104-3019
Fax 972 293-6641 Voice 972 293-2920
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:01 EDT