From: Jonathan Robie (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Feb 08 1999 - 14:44:44 EST
At 11:09 AM 2/8/99 PST, George Blaisdell wrote:
>It is an approach that holds promise, and certainly would not, imho,
>constitute 'proof' [by chiasm]. Earlier discussion on b-greek seemed to
>indicate that it very well may have been a fundamental characteristic of
>thought of predominantly non-literate cultures, because of its mnemonic
>and rhetorical capability.
That is to say, chiasm is a figure of speech. Like other figures of speech,
it is useful as a mnemonic and as a rhetorical device. For perspective,
think of other figures of speech such as metaphor, paradox, simile,
parallelism, etc., and think of chiasm as *one* of these many figures of
speech that may be used.
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:15 EDT