From: clayton stirling bartholomew (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Feb 18 1999 - 00:12:03 EST
>> I notice that ZAW is occasionally used in the LXX transitively [eg LXX Ps
>> 118:50]. Is this peculiar to LXX?
>> While I'm at it: does anyone have any thoughts on the strange DEUTEROPRWTW
>> reading in Lk 6:1 besides the suggestion of Skeat?
>> Rick Strelan
>> Studies in Religion
>> University of Queensland
> LXX Ps 118:50 ZHSON ME
> I would not call this a transitive use of ZAW.
Just as I pushed the send button for my first response, I thought to
myself, "why wouldn't you call this transitive?." I looked at the
passages in the LXX again and ZAW does appear to function as a
transitive in these passages. I guess I was befuddled by the fact that
the object of the verb is a suffix in the Hebrew.
-- Clayton Stirling Bartholomew Three Tree Point P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:16 EDT