From: Blahoslav Číčel (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Sep 16 1999 - 03:27:27 EDT
Dne ét, 16 z‡ż’ 1999 jste napsal(a):
> I think this particle is often overlooked and is also treated in a rather
> sloppy manner. Many seem to assume that DE and KAI are synonomous.
> I understand DE to be continuative and KAI to be adjunctive or ascensive.
> DE is sometimes translated "but" in English. Once again, I see DE to be
> primarily continuative while ALLA is adversative.
> Has anyone on list done extensive work in comparing these particles?
I have no extensive work, but I'd like to point again to that, what Carl wrote:
Another factor here is that it is the nature of the beast that is the Greek
language to require connective particles in a regular sequence of
discourse, and the weakest of such links is a DE. The beast that is the
English language has no such requirement. In this instance, I'm inclined to
think that when 17:6 ends with "and it would have heeded you," a more
forceful disjunction such as the DE implies in the Greek is actually
created by NOT translating the DE, i.e., by continuing straight on with,
"Which of you who has a slave who is plowing or tending a flock ... ?"
In my lenguage (czech) we have a similar particle: "pak", which was formerly use
in a similar way as DE, but now is fading out of the modern language in this
sense. So, if Czech, why not Greek? :-)
pastor, Most, Czech rep.
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:39 EDT