RE: Philippians 4:3-4 hWN TA ONOMATA EN BIBLW ZWHS

From: Bill Ross (wross@farmerstel.com)
Date: Fri Dec 17 1999 - 09:18:56 EST


<x-html><!x-stuff-for-pete base="" src="" id="0" charset="iso-8859-1"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT size=2>
<P>&lt;Carlton&gt;</P>
<P>You could begin a sentence with a relative clause and I suppose the relative
pronoun could be in the genitive case if its function within the</P>
<P>clause demanded it though I cannot think of any instances at the moment and I
do not have my laptop with accordance at home. However, in this instance</P>
<P>it seems better to me to allow the relative to modify TWN LOIPWN SUNERGWN
MOU.</P>
<P>&lt;Bill&gt;</P>
<P>Are you saying that either division would be acceptable grammatically, and
hence we need to look for something in context to decide?
</P></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

</x-html>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:50 EDT