RE: Philippians 4:3-4 hWN TA ONOMATA EN BIBLW ZWHS

From: Bill Ross (wross@farmerstel.com)
Date: Fri Dec 17 1999 - 09:19:37 EST


<x-html><!x-stuff-for-pete base="" src="" id="0" charset="iso-8859-1"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT size=2>
<P>&lt;Carl&gt;</P>
<P>...The very fact that a relative pronoun is used in hWN TA ONOMATA EN BIBLWi
ZWHS is an indication that the writer did NOT consider the clause beginning with
hWN to be an independent unit; he could very easily have written something like:
EKEINWN GAR TA ONOMATA EN BIBLWI ZWHS (ESTIN).</P>
<P>&lt;Bill&gt;</P>
<P>Are you saying that the relative pronoun allows for the admonition XAIRETE EN
KURIW to be a partner to the ONOMATA clause?</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

</x-html>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:50 EDT