From: Jason Hare (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Feb 24 2000 - 05:17:22 EST
MONOGENHS is more than an argument about translation, but one of root.
Does it come from MONOS + GENNAW (in some form) or from MONOS + GENOS
(kind)? Most today, so I have heard, say it from GENOS, making MONOGENHS
mean "one of a kind." This is opposition to the KJV "only begotten." It
was just something I threw on there for fun. :-)
Blessings be multiplied your way for bringing this up!
On 02/23/00, ""Larry J. Swain" <email@example.com>" wrote:
> Jason Hare wrote:
> > P.S. To make this contain Greek: =ABhOUTWS GAR AGAPHSEN hO QEOS TON KO=
> > hWSTE TON hUIOV TON MONOGENH EDWKEN, hINA PAS hO PISTEUWN EIS AUTON MH
> > APOLHTAI ALL' ECHi ZWHN AIWNION.=BB
> > What thinkest thou of MONOGENHS? Is it =ABonly begotten=BB or =ABone o=
> f a kind=BB?
> > :-)
> Why not both? How to translate it, that's a different question, but in m=
> why choose between the two when both are probably intended?
> Larry Swain
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:59 EDT