From: Blahoslav Cicel (most@cb.cz)
Date: Thu May 11 2000 - 01:51:20 EDT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Hare [mailto:parousia_occ@yahoo.com]
> 2 Thess. 2:1
> ERWTWMEN DE hUMAS, ADELFOI, hUPER THS PAROUSIAS
> TOU KURIOU hHMWN IHSOU CRISTOU KAI hHMWN
> EPISUNAGWGHS EP' AUTON
>
> Mike,
<SNIP>
> One thing that seems to hold
> for me is Sharp's rule. (... SNIP) If it applies
> to this construction (hUPER THS
> PAROUSIAS... KAI... EPISUNAGWGHS),
Is really Sharp's rule appliccable to this? I don't think so. The text
goes:
ERWTWMEN DE hUMAS, ADELFOI,
hUPER
THS PAROUSIAS TOU KURIOU hHMWN IHSOU CRISTOU
KAI hHMWN EPISUNAGWGHS EP' AUTON
the PAROUSIA is of the Christ and EPISUNAGWGH is of us
> then the
> construction would show that the two refer to the same
> event. When Christ appears, we will be gathered to
> Him.
I agree, but I don't need to bend Sharp's rule to prove it.
<SNIP>
> Jason
Blaho
---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:25 EDT