From: Patrick Narkinsky (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Sep 12 2000 - 16:35:00 EDT
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, clayton stirling bartholomew wrote:
> If it is too much expense or trouble to get the rights to the text of NA27
> one could just use W&H as a base text and have a small team NT scholars make
> a few "corrections" to W&H and this would permit you do break the strangle
> hold that GBS has on the GNT which amounts to a monopoly, since the
> competition is essentially non-existent.
I Am Not A Lawyer (or a Greek Scholar, for that matter).
But is Nestle-Aland really copyrightable? Is the text (written over 1900
years ago) under copyright? It seems questionable to me, since there is
presumably *no* original content in the words of the text itself. This
really skates the edge ... I suppose it could be argued that NA created
an original work by arranging the text -- however, it seems to me that the
work of the textual critic could be argued to be too mechanistic for that
to qualify as artistic creation.
Patrick Narkinsky email@example.com
Q: Why did the chicken cross the Moebius strip...
A:To get to the other ... er .. um .. never mind.
"It is not as a child that I believe and confess Jesus Christ. My Hosanna is
born of a furnace of doubt." -- Fyodor Dostoevski
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:35 EDT