From: Mark Wilson (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Oct 12 2000 - 01:01:59 EDT
In first John, I have been trying to figure out the reason for John to
distinguish various "familial" groups (TEKNIA, PAIDIA, PATERES, and
NEANISKOI). And I have yet to see any reason for the use of one designation
For example, the only characteristic used of PATERES (EGNWKATE) is also used
of PAIDIA. The common characteristic of NEANISKOI (NENIKHKATE) is also used
The references are as follows:
2:1 TEKNIA MH hAMARTHTE
2:12 TEKNIA AFEWNTAI hUMIN hAI hAMARTIAI
2:14 PAIDIA EGNWKATE
2:18 PAIDIA, ESCATH hWRA ESTIN
2:28 TEKNIA MENETE IN AUTWi
3.7 TEKNIA, MHDEIS PLANATW hUMAS
3.18 TEKNIA AGAPWMEN (first person?)
4.4 TEKNIA, KAI NENIKHKATE AUTOUS
5.21 TEKNIA, FULAXATE APO TWN EIDWLWN
2:13 PATERES, hOTI EGNWKATE
2:14 PATERES, hOTI EGNWKATE
2:13 NEANISKOI, hOTI NENIKHKATE
2:14 NEANISKOI … hO LOGOS TOU QEOU IN hUMIN MENEI
KAI NENIKHKATE TON PONHRON
I have been looking at each group with their corresponding
characteristic(s). Any suggestions as to why John uses these various groups?
The reason I am confused is because what is common to both the PATERES and
the NEANISKOI is found in the other group(s) (TEKNIA and/or PAIDIA). So why
identify the recipients of this letter from these different viewpoints?
There seems to be obvious overlap.
I had expected to find something unique to the PATERES or the NEANISKOI. But
since that did not prove to be the case, I became even more confused.
Any insights would be most appreciated.
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:38 EDT