From: Heath Curtis (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 11:21:10 EST
Is there any concensus out there about the antecedent of hWi in I Pt 1:6?
I've considered taking the relative as neuter thus leaving the possibilities
as the preceeding infinitive APOKALUFQHNAI or verses 3-5 as a whole. Or
perhaps it's masculine with the antecedent being QEOS or KAIRWi ESXATWi.
Any responses to any of these four options, or proposals for other options
Thanks is advance,
Heath R. Curtis
MDiv Student Concordia Seminary
MA Student Washington Univ. St. Louis
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:40 EDT