From: Mark Wilson (email@example.com)
Date: Wed May 30 2001 - 14:10:10 EDT
Thanks for reminding me that the punctuation in
our English translations/bibles are guestimates.
I have come up with the following regarding the
two options you present.
>Rev. 3.9c + 10a. 10b (option 1)
>KAI GNWSIN hOTI EGW HGAPHSA SE,
> hOTI ETHRHSAS TON LOGON THS hUPOMONHS MOU
>KA'GW SE THRHSW EK THS hWRAS TOU PEIRASMOU
This option seems likely for the following reasons:
1. hOTI ETHRHSAS functions as a "normal" subordinate clause.
(I understand that a hOTI subordinate clause can come BEFORE
the main (matrix??) clause, but that it is fairly rare.)
2. KA'GW is KAI EGW, and the future tense of THRHSW seems
to parallel the future tense of POIHSW of verse 9 (yielding
something like, "I will make....and I will keep...")
>Rev. 3.9c. 10a +10b (option 2)
>KAI GNWSIN hOTI EGW HGAPHSA SE.
>hOTI ETHRHSAS TON LOGON THS hUPOMONHS MOU
> KA'GW SE THRHSW EK THS hWRAS TOU PEIRASMOU
This option seems to make for a nice contrast/comparison
with the verb THREW, despite its rare syntactical form.
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:58 EDT