[b-greek] Re: Romans 4:1

From: c stirling bartholomew (cc.constantine@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Fri Jun 08 2001 - 01:19:01 EDT

on 6/7/01 9:51 PM, c stirling bartholomew wrote:

> C.E.B. Cranfield accepts the NA/UBS reading but he attaches KATA SARKA with
> hHMWN not TON PROPATORA. Cranfield's analysis really left me dumbfounded. I
> just don't get it. I would make both hHMWN and KATA SARKA limiting
> constituents attached to TON PROPATORA.

I think there is a better way of viewing this. Lets say that KATA SARKA
limits TON PROPATORA hHMWN as a unit, not TON PROPATORA or hHMWN. This may
be what Cranfield is driving at but it isn't what he said.

Clayton Stirling Bartholomew
Three Tree Point
P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062

B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:59 EDT