From: Stephen C. Carlson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jun 19 2001 - 00:06:04 EDT
At 09:10 PM 6/17/01 -0700, Kenneth Litwak wrote:
> I have some questions on the first half of Luke
>KAI KATENEUSAN TOIS METOCOS en TW hETERW PLOIW TOU
>ELONTAS SULLABESQAI AUTOIS
>1. When is it legitimate to take the definite article
>as a possessive? The first TOIS construciton is
>clealry missing AUTWN or the like, and I'm wondering
>if the article alone is considered to do that job?
In this case, the use of the possessive as in the
NRSV's "So they signaled their partners" is governed
by English's idiomatic considerations, not Greek's.
For exmaple, the AV puts the "their" in italics,
signaling that it was added to complete the sense of
the Greek but not literally present.
>2. TOU plus an infinitive is common, but what about
>the aorist participle between the two? I know the
>parti8ciple can be used as an imperative, but as part
>of a compound infinitive? Is it "to, afterhaving
>come, help" or "to come and help"?
It is a circumstantial participle, and its precise
nuance has to be gleaned from the context. As a
translation, "come and help" is nice and idiomatic.
>3. Why is this followed by a dative, not an
When SULLAMBANW means "to help out, aid," the
person being helped takes the dative and the
activity in which the help is given, if expressed,
takes the accusative. In Luke 5:7, the activity
Stephen C. Carlson mailto:email@example.com
Synoptic Problem Home Page http://www.mindspring.com/~scarlson/synopt/
"Poetry speaks of aspirations, and songs chant the words." Shujing 2.35
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:59 EDT