Date: Fri Jun 22 2001 - 10:53:53 EDT
In a message dated 06/22/2001 1:13:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
<< If Granville Sharp's rule is not (necessarily) applicable to the 2 Thess.
passage, why does the NIV translate Titus 2.13 as "looking for the blessed
hope--the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior..." It takes
ELPIDA and EPIFANEIA to be identical through (apparently) Sharp's rule.
Would it not be in the same category as 2 Thess. 2.1? Wallace's reason
for not including that passage is that it regards "concrete temporal
referents," one of which is the parousia. I would guess that ELPIDA isn't
really a "temporal event," but it is in reference to some temporal event.
I think if one can argue that per the context or by means of other NT
statements that ALPIDA and EPIFANEIAN THS DOXHS are the same object of
expectation then the NIV is acceptable. However, I believe EPIFANEIAN THS
DOXHS more naturally suggests "manifestations of the glory of the great God."
This is consistent with what Jesus taught his followers as recorded in the
Synoptic Gospels (Matt. 16:27; Mr 8:38; Lu 9:26).
So it could be that the "hope" is the "manifestation of the great God's
glory" in which the Savior, Jesus Christ, was believed to appear. If that is
the case, then "hope" could be a concrete temporal event, namely, the second
coming of Christ in the "great God's glory." So they could both be the same
concrete, temporal event.
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:59 EDT