From: Randall Buth (ButhFam@compuserve.com)
Date: Mon Aug 13 2001 - 07:07:58 EDT
On forms like FILEW
(in comparison with FILW~, FILEI~N, FILH~SAI) ,
>Randall calls them [FILEW-rb) "artificial"; I would call them
Both terms raise the same pedagogical questions:
When is a form synchronically real for language users?
And when are language users conscious of a
[underlying, artificial, abstract, analytical]
What forms are psychologically most central for a language user?
What forms are the most efficient for fluent language use?
And in line with Ward' linguistic approach, what can we learn from general
linguistics and language acquistion studies?
I will present a paper on this issue at SBL, Biblical Lexicography Section,
November in Denver.
UMEIS PANTES KEKLHMENOI ESTE.
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [firstname.lastname@example.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:03 EDT