From: lance w seevers (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Mar 02 2002 - 00:31:50 EST
I'm looking at Goodwin's Greek Grammar.(By the way, what is the general
opinion on this grammar? Is it considered any good?) In the discusson of
the circumstantial participle, he lists means or manner as one usage. Is
it too much of a stretch to say that BAPTIZONTES and DIDASKONTES is the
way or means that MAQHTEUSATE is carried out?
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 22:44:02 -0600 "Kevin Cauley" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> So the question to me is, if the action in the participles is
> with that of the main verb, does that imply that both DIDASKONTES
> BAPTIZONTES occur at the same time-GRAMMATICALLY?
> > POREUQENTES OUN MAQHTEUSATE PANTA TA EQNH BAPTIZONTES AUTOUS EIS
> > ONOMA
> > TOU PATROS KAI TOU hUIOU KAI TOU AHIOU PNEUMATOS DIDASKONTES
> > THREIN
> > PANTA OSA ENETEILAMHN hUNIN KAI IDOU EGO MEQ hUMWN EIMI PASAS TAS
> > HMERAS EWS
> > THS SUNTELEIAS
> > Question: How do the participles BAPTIZONTES and DIDASKONTES
> > to the
> > main verb MAQHTEUSATE from a strictly grammatical standpoint? No
> > theology
> > please, just grammar/syntax.
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:19 EDT