[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [nafex] Apple roostocks for Display Garden

If you're looking to make this a comprehensive test, Kim, there are
several newer rootstock candidates that merit inclusion:
    Geneva 16
    Geneva 11
    Geneva 30
    Supporter 1
    Supporter 2
    Supporter 3
    Supporter 4
    Budagovsky 491

We have seen little difference in tree size among M.27, P.22 and Bud.
491.  M.27 and P.16 are definitely less winter hardy than M.9, but that
isn't exactly your problem at Mt. Vernon.  Bud.491 is very brittle, but
once established is very productive.  P.22 tends to have one-sided root
system, mostly coarse roots.  Unbudded P.22 is quite late to break bud
in the spring;  still don't know what that implies for the tree in the

I can't recall any fire blight reports from your area.  If that is a
factor, though, then do remember that all except the Geneva stocks are
quite susceptible, and G.11 is only moderately resistant.

KJJSiebert@aol.com wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> Some of you who live in Western Washington may be aware of the Fruit
> Demonstration Garden project that we(WWTFRF) have been trying to get
> off the ground for several years. This project is a 5 acre
> demonstration garden at the Mount Vernon Station. The garden is
> divided into various sections and hopefully we will be planting a
> section to demonstrate the effects of various dwarfing rootstocks
> this spring.
> I am compiling a list of rootstock candidates for this garden and
> these are the ones on my list so far: M27, M9, P22, Mark, M26, Bud,
> and M7.
> I would like to have your opinions on what other rootstocks you think
> should be in this demonstration garden, and why. Also I would be
> interested in your opinions on P22 from the list above, since I have
> no experience with it.
> Thanks,  Kim