Re: GOODBY MIKE!
George Antony Ph 93818 (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
: Jay Hanson <email@example.com> writes:
: >Mike have just joined the rest in the doghouse with jw, charliew,
: >McCarthy, dlj. You are trying to tell us that ECOLOGISTS do
: >not know the definition ecology, but some politically-motivated
: >Usenet nitwit does.
: A totally inappropriate and intemperate response to a restrained, factual
: and perfectly topical contribution to the issue at hand.
I think it is totally appropriate to point out that ecologists know more
about Carrying Capacity and its definition than the economists whose
"economism" often blinds them to the basic realities of biology and
Many of these lightweights that Jay mentions in his post DON'T EVEN ACCEPT
that Carrying Capacity is relevant in describing and analysing human
societies and their relationship to the environment. For THESE ideologues
of hell-bent-for-growth dogma, even to begin to challenge the fine points
of defining the Carrying Capacity is itself the height of irrelevance.
** Yuri Kuchinsky in Toronto **
-- a webpage like any other... http://www.io.org/~yuku --
Most of the evils of life arise from man's being
unable to sit still in a room || B. Pascal