[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: GOODBY MIKE!
In article <56q0os$kn5@news1.io.org>, yuku@io.org (Yuri Kuchinsky) wrote:
> I think it is totally appropriate to point out that ecologists know more
> about Carrying Capacity and its definition than the economists whose
> "economism" often blinds them to the basic realities of biology and
> ecology.
>
> Many of these lightweights that Jay mentions in his post DON'T EVEN ACCEPT
> that Carrying Capacity is relevant in describing and analysing human
> societies and their relationship to the environment. For THESE ideologues
> of hell-bent-for-growth dogma, even to begin to challenge the fine points
> of defining the Carrying Capacity is itself the height of irrelevance.
>
> Ecologically,
>
> Yuri.
Here, here! Carrying capacity for those who subscribe to the economic
religion is equivalent to the maximum amount of profits which can be
generated.
------------------------------Regards--------------------------------
Roy C. Dudgeon <umdudgeo@cc.umanitoba.ca>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A THING IS RIGHT WHEN IT TENDS TO PRESERVE THE INTEGRITY, STABILITY
AND BEAUTY OF THE BIOTIC COMMUNITY. IT IS WRONG WHEN IT TENDS OTHER-
WISE.
--ALDO LEOPOLD, "THE LAND ETHIC". ---------------------------------------------------------------------
References: