[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: fHuman vs. natural influences on the environment
In article <lkn2zuunvo.fsf@sandy.ast.cam.ac.uk> steinn@sandy.ast.cam.ac.uk (Steinn Sigurdsson) writes:
In article <2bnLmKAOsMFyEweQ@wandana.demon.co.uk> Jim Barr <JimBarr@wandana.demon.co.uk> writes:
Several years ago, at a symposium for astrophysicists held in London, an
experiment was carried out. All the delegates were asked to calculate
how much energy it would take to bring one stationary electron from a
point in deep space ( but near a KNOWN stellar object) and bring it to
rest on the surface of the earth.
They would allow for mass and movement of all *major* solar objects but
not asteroids or deep space objects apart from the one mentioned above.
They were all *capable* of doing the sums and several of them did so.
The unamazing fact was that the *answers* that these scientists came up
with differed by as much as 13 orders of magnitude.
I don't believe you. Please provide a citation.
I don't understand.
It would seem to me that the energy required to move the electron
depends entirely on the electric potential difference between the
point in space and the surface of the earth. I would expect that to
be entirely unknown. I doubt that the potential differences are known
even within the solar system and may not even be constant over time.
It seems to me from what I have read that a lot is known about the
potential difference between the ionosphere and the earth's surface,
but I don't know if it is constant geographically or in time.
--
John McCarthy, Computer Science Department, Stanford, CA 94305
*
He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/progress/
Follow-Ups:
References: