[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Ecological Economics and Entropy
-
Subject: Re: Ecological Economics and Entropy
-
From: jmc@Steam.stanford.edu (John McCarthy)
-
Date: 16 Nov 1996 20:45:54 GMT
-
Article: 16050 of alt.sustainable.agriculture
-
Followup-To: talk.environment,sci.environment,sci.energy,sci.econ,sci.agriculture,alt.sustainable.agriculture
-
In-reply-to: bds@ipp-garching.mpg.de's message of 16 Nov 1996 18:48:48 GMT
-
Newsgroups: talk.environment, sci.environment, sci.energy, sci.econ, sci.agriculture, alt.sustainable.agriculture
-
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University
-
References: <E0x09A.5sw.0.sheppard@torfree.net> <56idc8$ipk@news.inforamp.net> <JMC.96Nov15171821@Steam.stanford.edu> <56l2ag$5eb0@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de>
-
Reply-To: jmc@cs.Stanford.EDU
-
Xref: newz.oit.unc.edu talk.environment:77256 sci.environment:111863 sci.energy:58255 sci.econ:60372 sci.agriculture:15969 alt.sustainable.agriculture:16050
The source from which I read that the number of undernourished was
down from 800 million to 400 million was an article primarily about
fishing from the same Rome meeting. It is interesting to compare the
news stories from that meeting, because each news source has its own
agenda.
--
John McCarthy, Computer Science Department, Stanford, CA 94305
http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/progress/
During the last years of the Second Millenium, the Earthmen complained
a lot.
References: