Login

Publications  •  Project Statistics

Glossary  •  Schools  •  Disciplines
People Search: 
   
Title/Abstract Search: 

Dissertation Information for V. Lonnie Lawson

NAME:
- V. Lonnie Lawson

DEGREE:
- Ph.D.

DISCIPLINE:
- Library and Information Science

SCHOOL:
- Florida State University (USA) (1988)

ADVISORS:
- F. William Summers

COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
- Marcy P. Driscoll
- Elisabeth A. Logan
- Phyllis J. Van Orden

MPACT Status: Fully Complete

Title: Using a computer-assisted instruction program as an alternative to the traditional library orientation/instruction tour: An evaluative study

Abstract: The purpose of this study is three-fold. First it determines if college freshmen who use a computer-assisted instruction (CAI) program will have higher adjusted post-test means than students who take a traditional library tour or students with no formal library instruction. Second, it ascertains whether a computer-assisted instruction program is more cost effective than the traditional library tours. Finally, it reveals if students prefer being taught general library orientation and the use of basic reference tools using a computer-assisted instruction program instead of taking a traditional library tour.

To accomplish these objectives ENG 1020 Rhetorical Writing classes at Central Missouri State University participated in an experimental study. Eight classes, consisting of one hundred seventy-two students, were divided into three groups that consisted of a computer-assisted instruction group, a tour group and a control group. Each group was given a pre-test, subjected to the treatment of the CAI program or the tour and then administered a post-test, which determined the amount of difference in the learning that took place between the two tests. Each test also served another purpose. The pre-test collected student demographic information and the post-test gathered information the students' opinions and on the evaluation of the particular treatment.

The results indicated that (1) the CAI group showed the highest adjusted post-test means, (2) the CAI was cost effective in two of three models presented and (3) there was no strong overall acceptance in the CAI group's opinions/ratings over that of the tour group.

MPACT Scores for V. Lonnie Lawson

A = 0
C = 0
A+C = 0
T = 0
G = 0
W = 0
TD = 0
TA = 0
calculated 2008-01-31 06:05:00

Advisors and Advisees Graph

generating graph, please reload

Students under V. Lonnie Lawson

ADVISEES:
- None

COMMITTEESHIPS:
- None