Kim Lester (kim@dfusion.com.au)
Thu, 13 Jan 2000 03:01:16 +0000
Guylhem Aznar wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 06:01:50AM +0000, Kim Lester wrote:
> > <humour=on>
> > :-) Perhaps we'd better vote on a committee to define the
> > proposal format. Hmmm, now how do we structure the
> > voting. Better have a committee for that.
> > <humnour=off>
>
> Not joking, what about a representative for each documentation project
> (within each documentation project a vote should take place to define
> the representative vote).
>
> Then we could make each representative vote.
>
Yes, I think it might be a good idea to have some
form of representative vote. Not that I think
there would necessarily be any delierate vote stacking ,
but we need to be careful that each organisation is
visibly represented and has a fair say.
That only leasves the issue of people like myself
who (deliberately) have no particular allegiance.
I'll certainly have my say :-) but perhaps not vote.
There may be others in that category
Hmmm, how about 2 voting categories.
1 person per organisation
every-one for themselves
But how would we combine the results?
regards
Kim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed Jan 12 2000 - 22:03:59 EST