>If we can prove he was using offiial time, official fund, official resource... >, then we can say Mr. Eftimiades needs get Government permission before he >make any noise and he did not. We academic get used to reading word by word, to a 90% accuracy if not 100%. But that should not be the way we read DIA's letter. It can only be understood as showing their general attitude towards this incident and MR. E, which is, unfortunately, "not to interfere". Even if you could prove beyound doubt that he might have used some official time for the book, so what? "Government permission", what government permission? He had DIA's clearance. Forget about DIA.