>If the only thing he was entitled to in the program was a member of >DIA(?) and no disclaim whatsoever was made, then we can safely say >that the program _suggested_ that his view was sponsored by the agency. Can "disclaim -> not responsible" leads to "not disclaim -> responsible"? >Either the agency or Mr. Eftimiades or CBS, more all of them, should take >the responsibility for what Mr. Eftimiades said on CBS. What responsibility? >You can't interview Premier Li Peng in a formal setting without special >disclaims and later on claims that his view is his own, not of the >Chinese government. Well, you can complain. That's for sure, if Li Peng said something stupid. But what have they violated? Law, civiral/human right, government regulation or ethical rule?