[Prev][Next][Index]
No Subject
>If the only thing he was entitled to in the program was a member of
>DIA(?) and no disclaim whatsoever was made, then we can safely say
>that the program _suggested_ that his view was sponsored by the agency.
Can "disclaim -> not responsible" leads to "not disclaim -> responsible"?
>Either the agency or Mr. Eftimiades or CBS, more all of them, should take
>the responsibility for what Mr. Eftimiades said on CBS.
What responsibility?
>You can't interview Premier Li Peng in a formal setting without special
>disclaims and later on claims that his view is his own, not of the
>Chinese government.
Well, you can complain. That's for sure, if Li Peng said something stupid.
But what have they violated? Law, civiral/human right, government regulation
or ethical rule?