You are here: SriPedia - Ramanuja - Archives - Apr 2004

Ramanuja List Archive: Message 00043 Apr 2004

 
Apr 2004 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear Sriman Kasturi Rangan,

It may not seem to be dangerous to all! The issue of Kaivalya mOskha 
and the ThennAchArya position is likely to be addressed in the coming 
updates of our yatirajadasa website. At this moment, I do not have 
much idea. Learend bhAgavatas may answer your question.

Regards
Vishnu

--- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "amshuman_k" <amshuman_k@xxxx> wrote:
> Dear bhAgavatas,
> 
> One of the difference between the two kalais is the nature of 
> kaivalyam. Both sampradAyas accept kaivalyam is inferior to 
bhagavad-
> sAyujyam/parama padam. However, the thenkalai position is that - it 
> is permanent; (from the explanation of a TK Acharya), the jIvan 
made 
> a bad decision; it asked for it, aspired for it and got it. So, it 
is 
> stuck with it.
> Isn't this dangerously similar to a christian claim that "accept 
> Jesus or you will goto eternal hell?" (You make a bad decision of 
not 
> accepting christ; you asked for it and got it). I request 
> clarifications from learned bhAgavatas.
> 
> Regards,
> KK





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list