Dear Sriman Kasturi Rangan, It may not seem to be dangerous to all! The issue of Kaivalya mOskha and the ThennAchArya position is likely to be addressed in the coming updates of our yatirajadasa website. At this moment, I do not have much idea. Learend bhAgavatas may answer your question. Regards Vishnu --- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "amshuman_k" <amshuman_k@xxxx> wrote: > Dear bhAgavatas, > > One of the difference between the two kalais is the nature of > kaivalyam. Both sampradAyas accept kaivalyam is inferior to bhagavad- > sAyujyam/parama padam. However, the thenkalai position is that - it > is permanent; (from the explanation of a TK Acharya), the jIvan made > a bad decision; it asked for it, aspired for it and got it. So, it is > stuck with it. > Isn't this dangerously similar to a christian claim that "accept > Jesus or you will goto eternal hell?" (You make a bad decision of not > accepting christ; you asked for it and got it). I request > clarifications from learned bhAgavatas. > > Regards, > KK
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |