You are here: SriPedia - Ramanuja - Archives - Oct 2006

Ramanuja List Archive: Message 00034 Oct 2006

 
Oct 2006 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear Swamy,
I am so sorry for not being specific - I only meant about reading 
tuqluq and not about Bhagavatha Puranam(why would I ever question 
that??:)...
adiyEn,
rAmAnuja dAsan.
--- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, <aravamudhan@...> wrote:
>
> Narasimhan Swamin,
> 
> Srimad Bhagavatha Mahapuram is one of the 6 satvika puranams and 
per our Sri Vaishhava view it is considered authentic.
> 
> I am also reading the series in the Thuklaq magazine. what the 
editor of
> Thuklaq is writing is the same way as all advaitins have been 
talking. It is not out of place to mention here about them 
as  'Prachanna Saivities' (disguised Saivas)
> 
> It is true that Dattatreya's account is mentioned . None of our 
Acharyas would negate this. 
> 
> The very first slokam 'of Srimad Bhagavatam, beginning 
with  'Janmasyatya' clearly establishes Vishistadvaita.
> 
> In several places in Srimad Baghavatam, the paratvam of Peruman is 
clearly established .
> 
> Most of the quotes of our  Alwars are only from Srimad Bhagavatam.
> 
> The issue here is Sri Cho Ramaswamy (Editor, Thuklaq) chooses to
> elaborate only those place where it is convenient to advaitins and 
establish something such as 'all Mumoorthies are same'  (Mumoorthy 
Samyam)
> 
> From the view of Sarira Sariri Bhava of Sri Vishitadvaita, this is 
true. However, viewing from Seshi/sesha relationship, Srimad 
Bhagavatam clearly says which God is the primordial God.
> 
> The blame need to go to the editor and not to the Srimad Bhagavata 
Mahapurnam.
> 
> 
> Adiyen,
> 
> Regards
> KM Narayanan
> ---- Lakshmi Narasimhan <nrusimhann@...> wrote: 
> > First of all, is it worth reading such a book at all :) I wonder 
many 
> > a times what authenticity would such books bring in?!
> > adiyEn,
> > rAmAnuja dAsan
> > 
> > --- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vidyalakshmi <vidya_lr@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sri:
> > > 
> > > I was reading this week's edition of 'Hindu Maha
> > > Samuthram' in Thuglak. This talks about Srimad
> > > Bhagavatham - 2nd Baagam, 42nd Adhiyayam
> > > 
> > > In this, it is said that Atri Muni's performed
> > > rigorous penance and prayed to the lord of all worlds
> > > that he should get a son equivalent to the lord of all
> > > worlds. Brahma, Vishnu and Sivan appeared before him
> > > and granted that Atri Maharishi will get three sons as
> > > the amsam of each of them and that there is no
> > > difference between the three.
> > > 
> > > Why is there a contradiction like this in Bhagavatha
> > > Puranam, in the same series, i was also reading about
> > > other puranams where such things have been said.
> > > 
> > > Could someone please explain this.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Vidya.
> > > 
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
>









Azhvar EmberumAnAr JeeyAr ThiruvadigalE Saranam 
http://www.vedics.net

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:ramanuja-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:ramanuja-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list