You are here: SriPedia - Ramanuja - Archives - Oct 2006

Ramanuja List Archive: Message 00031 Oct 2006

 
Oct 2006 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Narasimhan Swamin,

Srimad Bhagavatha Mahapuram is one of the 6 satvika puranams and per our Sri 
Vaishhava view it is considered authentic.

I am also reading the series in the Thuklaq magazine. what the editor of
Thuklaq is writing is the same way as all advaitins have been talking. It is 
not out of place to mention here about them as  'Prachanna Saivities' 
(disguised Saivas)

It is true that Dattatreya's account is mentioned . None of our Acharyas would 
negate this. 

The very first slokam 'of Srimad Bhagavatam, beginning with  'Janmasyatya' 
clearly establishes Vishistadvaita.

In several places in Srimad Baghavatam, the paratvam of Peruman is clearly 
established .

Most of the quotes of our  Alwars are only from Srimad Bhagavatam.

The issue here is Sri Cho Ramaswamy (Editor, Thuklaq) chooses to
elaborate only those place where it is convenient to advaitins and establish 
something such as 'all Mumoorthies are same'  (Mumoorthy Samyam)

>From the view of Sarira Sariri Bhava of Sri Vishitadvaita, this is true. 
>However, viewing from Seshi/sesha relationship, Srimad Bhagavatam clearly says 
>which God is the primordial God.

The blame need to go to the editor and not to the Srimad Bhagavata Mahapurnam.


Adiyen,

Regards
KM Narayanan
---- Lakshmi Narasimhan <nrusimhann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> First of all, is it worth reading such a book at all :) I wonder many 
> a times what authenticity would such books bring in?!
> adiyEn,
> rAmAnuja dAsan
> 
> --- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vidyalakshmi <vidya_lr@...> wrote:
> >
> > Sri:
> > 
> > I was reading this week's edition of 'Hindu Maha
> > Samuthram' in Thuglak. This talks about Srimad
> > Bhagavatham - 2nd Baagam, 42nd Adhiyayam
> > 
> > In this, it is said that Atri Muni's performed
> > rigorous penance and prayed to the lord of all worlds
> > that he should get a son equivalent to the lord of all
> > worlds. Brahma, Vishnu and Sivan appeared before him
> > and granted that Atri Maharishi will get three sons as
> > the amsam of each of them and that there is no
> > difference between the three.
> > 
> > Why is there a contradiction like this in Bhagavatha
> > Puranam, in the same series, i was also reading about
> > other puranams where such things have been said.
> > 
> > Could someone please explain this.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Vidya.
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>




Azhvar EmberumAnAr JeeyAr ThiruvadigalE Saranam 
http://www.vedics.net

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:ramanuja-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:ramanuja-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list