Sri: Dear Sir, Adiyen does not understand what is meant by '> From the view of Sarira Sariri Bhava of Sri > Vishitadvaita, this is true. However, viewing from > Seshi/sesha relationship, Srimad Bhagavatam clearly > says which God is the primordial God. ' Could you please elaborate this? Dasan. --- aravamudhan@xxxxxxx wrote: > Narasimhan Swamin, > > Srimad Bhagavatha Mahapuram is one of the 6 satvika > puranams and per our Sri Vaishhava view it is > considered authentic. > > I am also reading the series in the Thuklaq > magazine. what the editor of > Thuklaq is writing is the same way as all advaitins > have been talking. It is not out of place to mention > here about them as 'Prachanna Saivities' (disguised > Saivas) > > It is true that Dattatreya's account is mentioned . > None of our Acharyas would negate this. > > The very first slokam 'of Srimad Bhagavatam, > beginning with 'Janmasyatya' clearly establishes > Vishistadvaita. > > In several places in Srimad Baghavatam, the paratvam > of Peruman is clearly established . > > Most of the quotes of our Alwars are only from > Srimad Bhagavatam. > > The issue here is Sri Cho Ramaswamy (Editor, > Thuklaq) chooses to > elaborate only those place where it is convenient to > advaitins and establish something such as 'all > Mumoorthies are same' (Mumoorthy Samyam) > > From the view of Sarira Sariri Bhava of Sri > Vishitadvaita, this is true. However, viewing from > Seshi/sesha relationship, Srimad Bhagavatam clearly > says which God is the primordial God. > > The blame need to go to the editor and not to the > Srimad Bhagavata Mahapurnam. > > > Adiyen, > > Regards > KM Narayanan > ---- Lakshmi Narasimhan <nrusimhann@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > First of all, is it worth reading such a book at > all :) I wonder many > > a times what authenticity would such books bring > in?! > > adiyEn, > > rAmAnuja dAsan > > > > --- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vidyalakshmi > <vidya_lr@...> wrote: > > > > > > Sri: > > > > > > I was reading this week's edition of 'Hindu Maha > > > Samuthram' in Thuglak. This talks about Srimad > > > Bhagavatham - 2nd Baagam, 42nd Adhiyayam > > > > > > In this, it is said that Atri Muni's performed > > > rigorous penance and prayed to the lord of all > worlds > > > that he should get a son equivalent to the lord > of all > > > worlds. Brahma, Vishnu and Sivan appeared before > him > > > and granted that Atri Maharishi will get three > sons as > > > the amsam of each of them and that there is no > > > difference between the three. > > > > > > Why is there a contradiction like this in > Bhagavatha > > > Puranam, in the same series, i was also reading > about > > > other puranams where such things have been said. > > > > > > Could someone please explain this. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Vidya. > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Azhvar EmberumAnAr JeeyAr ThiruvadigalE Saranam http://www.vedics.net Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:ramanuja-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:ramanuja-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |