[B-Greek] Word Emphasis in Matthew 9:32

Mark Lightman lightmanmark at yahoo.com
Thu Mar 31 08:00:12 EDT 2011


Jeremy asked
 
<However, my larger question has to do with whether word order or word placement 
in a sentence indicates nuances of meaning.>
 
Hi Jeremy,

You bet, but the nuances are so nuanced that they cannot be demonstrated or 
falsified.

Here's Euripides' Alcestis line 9

καὶ τόνδε ἔσῳζον οἶκον ἐς τόδ' ἡμέρας.           KAI TONDE ESWiZON OIKON ES TOD' 
hHMERAS.

"And I preserved this house right up until today."

And here is the comment on the line by Lusching:

"Notice the word order. Apollo puts the verb, as it were, INSIDE the house as if 
he were saving it by his presence in it."

The only way to prove or disprove Lusching's point would be to ask Euripides.  I 
wonder if any Greek author ever talks about his or her choice of word order?  
Lucian, I think, gives the Greek view on this.  When he goes to the Island of 
the Blessed, he asks Homer why he began his story with the wrath of Achilles.  
Homer says it just came to him that way,  without giving it much thought.  
(οὕτως ἐπελθεῖν αὐτῳ μηδὲν ἐπιτηδεύσαντι)


<Does the word order of the adjective κωφὸν (KWFON) before the participle  
δαιμονιζόμενον (DAIMONIZOMENON)  communicate, as an older commentator  like 
Alfred Plummer  thinks it does, that the man's muteness is primary, while the 
fact that  he is demon-possessed is secondary?>

Same thing.  The only way to prove or disprove this would be to ask Matthew.  My 
guess is he would say this is just the way the words came out.  


Hamlet:  Do you see yonder cloud that's almost in shape of a camel?
Polonius:  By th' mass and 'tis, like a camel indeed.
Hamlet: Methinks it is like a weasel.
Polonius: It is backed like a weasel.
Hamlet:  Or like a whale
Polonius: Very like a whale


 

Mark L Φωσφορος



FWSFOROS MARKOS 




________________________________
 From: "spencerj76 at aol.com" <spencerj76 at aol.com>
To: b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org
Sent: Tue, March 29, 2011 8:50:06 AM
Subject: [B-Greek] Word Emphasis in Matthew 9:32



29 March 2011

Friends:

I was wondering about a matter of emphasis that may or may not be implied in the 
word order of Matthew 9:32:

Αὐτῶν δὲ ἐξερχομένων ἰδοὺ προσήνεγκαν αὐτῷ ἄνθρωπον κωφὸν δαιμονιζόμενον

AUTWN DE EXERCHOMENWN IDOU PROSHNEGKAN AUTWi ANQRWPON KWFON DAIMONIZOMENON

Does the word order of the adjective κωφὸν (KWFON) before the participle 
δαιμονιζόμενον (DAIMONIZOMENON)  communicate, as an older commentator like 
Alfred Plummer  thinks it does, that the man's muteness is primary, while the 
fact that he is demon-possessed is secondary? Or is that pressing the Greek word 
order too far? For the sake of discussion, I'd like to note Matthew 12:22:

Τότε προσηνέχθη αὐτῷ δαιμονιζόμενος τυφλὸς καὶ κωφός.

TOTE PROSHNECHQH AUTWi DAIMONIZOMENOS TUFLOS KAI KWFOS. 

In this case, would the placement of the participle before the two adjectives 
indicate that the demon-possession of the man contributed to the person's 
blindness and muteness, demon-possession being primary?  


These are specific textual questions. However, my larger question has to do with 
whether word order or word placement in a sentence indicates nuances of meaning. 
In this context, I thought I'd quote A. T. Robertson and W. Hersey Davis:

"It is possible in Greek to express the most delicate shades of an idea by means 
of voice, tense,  mode, cases, prepositions, particles, conjunctions. Often an 
idea in Greek can be expressed in various ways that are substantially alike, but 
yet differ in ways that the sensitive Greek mind understands. So the Greek has 
liberty where the Latin has bonds. The Greek may use coordinating clauses or 
subordinating clauses with conjunctions, or the infinitive, or the particple. 
His sentences may be short or long. He may use prepositions freely or not. Only 
do not accuse a Greek of using one construction for another. Freedom is the 
glory of the Greek language. Each writer has his own style and flavor" (A New 
Short Grammar of the Greek Testament, 10th ed. [Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 
1958], pp. 318-319). Robertson doesn't specifically mention worder order or word 
placement here as a factor in nuanced Greek, but might it be a factor?

This matter of word order or word placement interests me, but I don't have many 
recent resources dealing with the  topic. I'd be interested in the comments of 
list members.

Best wishes,
Jeremy Spencer
---
B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
B-Greek mailing list
B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek



More information about the B-Greek mailing list