You are here: SriPedia - Oppiliappan - Archives - Mar 2005

Oppiliappan List Archive: Message 00037 Mar 2005

 
Mar 2005 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear Sri Rajaram :
 
Buddha is not accepted as an avathAram by aasthikAs , who
take Vedam as PramANam . The rest of the answer to your 
question is dealt by the Lord in Srimath Bhagavath GithA ,
when he talks about His avathAra Rahasyam .  We can focus on
that .
 
V.Sadagopan
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 6:41 AM
Subject: [Oppiliappan] tri yuga

dear bhagavathas,
 
at the outset, your answers seemed very convincing. but on reflection, it remains unanswered.
 
in srimad bhagavatham 7.9.48, it is said stated that the lord is "channa kalau" or unmanifest in kali yuga. the same verse also says that the lord is tri yuga - abhavah atha tri yuga. if the meaning to be taken is that the lord appears only in the other three yugas and not in kali yuga, then how do we account for buddha, kalki and archa avataras ? if the meaning is that the lord appears in kali yuga, then why shoud he be called channa kalau ?
 
has any purcavharya dealth with this point ?
 
best regards
rajaram v.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
click here


Yahoo! Groups Links


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list