You are here: SriPedia - Ramanuja - Archives - Apr 2003

Ramanuja List Archive: Message 00055 Apr 2003

 
Apr 2003 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha

>If someone says it is the "maya" sita,then it has the touch of 
>Advaitham.
I disagree to this to quite some extent. This is purely subjective 
and is based on the perspective. Once again, I guess, Shri 
Soundararajan has told us the story of the Gaudia Vaishanavas that he 
had heard, but, I guess he didn't tell us the intent behind or the 
audience that the Gaudia mutt targets at. Saying "maya" Sita may look 
like advaitic philosophy only if seen from the philosophical 
perspective. When it comes to philosophies, Ramayana/Mahabharatha are 
definitely referred to, but not to substantiate any hypothesis but 
only to assist, in the path of substantiating the appropriate 
hypothesis i.e it is easy to explain to people by explaining some 
examples, although, the hypothesis is being proved only from 
explanations that are profound in logic and would stand alone without 
these examples.

I request someone to clearly post on what the Gaudia mutt has to say 
on this subject and I feel it is not right on our part to even 
analyse on this unless we understand the appropriate intent as this 
might immediately give a wrong impression about another tradition / 
school of thought.

There are various levels of the audience/people to whom different 
philosphies are targeted at. A four year old boy would not understand 
if we say god manifests in five forms i.e para, vyuha, vibhava, 
archai and antharyami. We need to take him to the temple and say that 
lord looks like that and make him BELIEVE that. And then later on as 
he believes and then starts analysing, based on further learnings, 
that, there are different forms of the lord. As we all know, the 
buddhists(nastikas) were thrown out mostly by the advaitic philosophy
(credits to Sankara) and the advaitic philosophy was left as it is 
pretty much to a large extent except for the places where Shri 
Ramanujar refuted Sankara/Bhaskra/Yadavaprakasa/Prabhakara 
incorrect/advaitic views. That is why he still called it as Advaitam, 
but a variant of it i.e Vichista-Advaitam. We say that, advaitam 
preserved the theism (There is a popular anecdote "advaitam protected 
the paddy from the stones"). And then Vichista-Advaitam preserved the 
original intent of the vedic scripts i.e the shareera-shariri bhava 
i.e the perfect explanation of the jeevatma/paramatma relationship 
and their appropriate swaroopams and hence popularly known by the 
phrase -"Vichistadvaitam protected the rice from the paddy".

Probably the Gaudia mutt addresses the foreigners i.e non indians:) 
For them, it might probably make sense to propagate a good image of 
Sita, otherwise, people would suspect her purity up-front. For 
example, Valmiki clearly says that Ravana touched Sita and held her 
hair and grabbed her and took her away. But, Kamban does not say 
this. He does not want to project Sita as impure for the readers up-
front. The intent is not to use his creativity and hide the historic 
event, but to make the appropriate message reach the appropriate 
audience. So people at the atheist level may have to go through these 
kind of things to first believe god exist or whatever and then as 
they believe they get more interested and try to find out the correct 
information and get into the next inner circle and so on and finally 
get into the innermost. For those who are already born and brought 
up with the Ramanuja Sampradaya, there is no need to even listen to 
any other sampradayam. For ex, I wouldn't even bother to attend a 
meeting/lecture from ANYONE else other than from those great leaders 
from our sampradayam and this is what, to my knowledge, is expected 
of every sincere follower of Shri Ramanuja Sampradayam and hence I 
don't even have to analyse on any other stories of other 
sampradayams. When such a question arises to whether those stories 
are right or not, the first thing that we need to ask ourselves is, 
do we understand our sampradayam at the first place? Did we try to 
learn it from an acharyan or at the least, read the books written by 
one of them? If not, dear devotees, let us start with that rather 
than even trying to analyze other sampradayams. As Smt Nappinnai 
rightly put it, we should start reading the articles posted by our 
leaders like Shri Chinna Jeeyar swami, Velukkudi swami and so on and 
stop listening to others until we complete our feat of learning our 
own sampradayam to the best extent possible.

For us who are born and brought up in Shri RAmanuja Sampradayam this 
is all we need to follow:
"Puruvacharyargal podham anuttanangal
Kooruvar vaartthaigalai kondu neer theri
Irul tharuma nyalatthe imbamuttru vaazhum
Therul tharuma desikanai therndu" - Upadesa Rattina Malai

Yatheendra Pravanam Vandhe RAMYA Jamataram Munim

Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan,
Lakshmi Narasimhan

PS: BTW, I attended the Rama-Sita Thirukkalyana mahotsavam today
(saturday) in the Lemont(Chicago) Shri Ramar Temple - that was based 
on the Shri Rama Navami. Thanks to the lord, for making me go there 
and giving me an oppurtunity to attend the entire function which was, 
to say the least, a wonderful treat for the eyes. I just cannot 
explain it in words, but for those who missed it, my regrets!!





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list