You are here: SriPedia - Ramanuja - Archives - Oct 2005

Ramanuja List Archive: Message 00181 Oct 2005

 
Oct 2005 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


sri:
Srimathe Ramanujaya Nama:

You raise valid questions, but these type of emotional quesions
are better answered over the phone or better yet in person.
[30 minutes and a open mind will anyone to 
see the beauty of Sri Ramanuja Sampradayam]

However, adiyen will try to answer your questions:
[Read with open mind and genuine interest in learning the truth]

--- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Sadagopan Vasudevan <satakopanv@xxxx> wrote:
>
> Dear Friends:
>  I am seeing many versions of this story.

POINT 1
=========
Any thing we say should be based on purvacharyas works and purvacharyas works 
only, 
when we do that we have only one version,  one voice and one message.

Anytime people start writing anything on their own, without repeating 
purvacharyas words, 
it causes what you see today multiple versions.  

Some of the newer stories floated and their modifications every decade
are not based on Purvacharyas.

Now am i saying this on my own or using purvacharyas words?
=========================================================
munnOr mozhintha * muRai thappAmal kEttu *
pinnOrnthu thAm athanaip pEsAthE ** - tham nenjchil
thORRinathE solli * ithu suththa upathEsavara
vARRathenbar * mUrkkarAvAr                     [Pasuram 71: Upadesa Rattina 
malai]


Those who do not learn the message through the acharya from the authentic 
lineage (OranVazhi Sampradaya), 
and pass the message as exactly taught to them, 
But instead pass meanings that come to their mind (i.e they do not repeat 
Purvacharyas) 
Yet they justify that this is what purvacharyas have said - Such people are 
foolish themselves. 
(Bigger damage is done to community as others may think they are genuine as 
they look and talk like authentic followers of OranVazhi.)

So how do you know the differrence, if the words of purvacharyas is repeated, 
then they are genuine, if not they are foolish and they are making others who 
read/ follow them also foolish.

Look at some of the recent books released, and the one that is being
debated here. If you find exacle purvacharys words repeted (with ref. to 
pasuram vyakhyanam etc..)
then you know you got a genuine one, else they are self made material
(these self made books and material, may have 80 to 90% good and +ve material 
but the other 
small percentage of incorrect material would do more harm than)

> If indeed the stories by Anbil at the link is wrong, and if indeed many 
> others have used the same (fromk 3000 padi and not 6000 padi)
> then why have the other scholars from Thenkalai side not 
> protested this at all. (That tell me this may be true)

See POINT 1 above, if its true then it will be repeating Purvacharyas 
(not self interpretations)

 
> q1:  Even today why do the leaders of Thenkalai not protest this?

Many Acharyas have protested and written but after a while they give us 
on such people (since they realize these individuals are not sleeping
but just acting like they are asleep:  Meaning they know what they 
are doing is wrong and still continue it )

Great Acharyas like HH Sriman Narayana Jeeyar swami
have written asking the mis-inoformers to stop, 
HH even posted on on srirangasri lists, (the message was NOT approved)

If a person is not willing to listen to HH Ramanuja Jeeyar Swami,
do you think they are willing to listen to others.

Here is an excerpt from the mail of HH Ramanuja Jeeyar Swami
This message was not approved on srirangasri list.
But it was approved on HH's list: jetusa:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jetusa/message/989

=====Jetusa message# 989 =====
Better to understand the right things and inform. If
it is only for your own enjoyment, you do whatever you
wish. But when we inform to others, we should be very
correct for ourselves. Otherwise, that becomes
irrepairable damage and thus an inexcusable sin to
pu:rva:charyas. We hope you try to understand.

=chinnajeeyar=

===================================================
 
> q2: Others from this group have written to me saying that
> Desikan is thenkalai only, but got "hijkacked" by brahminical 
> Vaishanvas to be their sole leader about 200 years ago,
> and then started all the conversions.

Today:
Thenkalai   - More emphasis on Sri Vaishnavam  
Vadakalai   - More emphasis on Brahminism

Purvahcaryas NEVER used the word Thenkalai/ Vadakalai 
in their works or even referred to it.
Swamin Desikan never referred to any kalais in any of his works
Neither did all the Purvacharyas in OranVazhi.

There was only Ramanuja Sampradayam till 1750 for sure.
(You may want to refer to Koil Olugus of Thiurmalai and Srirangam for 
reference.)

Some brahminical oriented devotees, did not like the direction set by 
Sri Pillai Lokachar and Mamunikal. (More emphasis on Sri Vaishnavathvam
thus allowing samashreyanam to all people regardless of caste.).
These few brahminical devotees drifted apart, this differrence became 
bigger and bigger to the point that a seperate sampradayam got formed.

Until 1750 CE, you cannot see any documented Bharanyasam as is being
followed today in the Vadakalai Sampradayam.
If Vadakalai Sampradayam says they follow Swami Desikan, then please
follow him fully. He did not undergo a seperate ritual (After samashreyaanm)
called bharanyasam, neither the his famous Son, or PB Anna his famous disciple.

Also until a few generations ago Vadakalai acharyas did not perform
intitiation (samashreyanam) for Non-Brahmins.

Hence, Swami Desikan also lived and practiced Ramanuja Sampradayam only, 
and did not intend to create a new one called Desika Sampradayam,

> If you Think logically, Swami Desikan is in almost all the
> temples including srirangam. Everywhere he is Vadakalai only, 
> so you have to accept what you see.

If you read the history of Desikan Sannidhi in Srirangam, 
any Devotee of Desikan would cry.
The original Vigraham was mutilated to change the thiruman to 
suit the whim of one group of people, 
this left marks on the forehead of the great Desika, 
hence that desika was removed and new one installed with 
the Thiruman of their choice. 
(Which shows clearly the ones who did this do not love 
Desikan, but are fanatic about the Thiruman on the Forehead.)

The truth is known to many, but mis-information will 
only make the matters worse.
=================================================






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/.itolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list