You are here: SriPedia - SriRangaSri - Archives - Jul 2004

SriRangaSri List Archive: Message 00240 Jul 2004

 
Jul 2004 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear Bhagavathas,

This may be deviating a little bit from the present topic.

I being from technical background as well believe Vedas are
also science. Our ancient Indian Science was subject based and
not object based as is the prsent day science.

I still agree with our ancestors who rightly termed Perumal as
Ksheerasaagara Shayana (One who rests on the milky ocean).
If we are not wrong, our galaxy is named Milky way. Our ancestors
were far ahead of the present day science.

The other point would I would like to stress is the Navagraham.
Navagraham depicts Sun at the centre of the Graha (planetary) 
system. This is the heliocentric thoery. Our ancestors knew this
long back. But for the modern day science, it was Galileo who
gave this theory.

If we can spend more time into the works of ancestors, may be 
we can find even more that has not discovered or invented yet.

Aduyen,
Thuphal Viayaraghava Dasan
Hungary


-----Original Message-----
From:   Sudarshan K Madabushi [mailto:mksudarshan2002@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Tue 7/20/2004 6:52 PM
To:     SriRangaSri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc:     
Subject:        [SriRangaSri] Re: Moolavar

Dear Bhagavatas:
As mentioned in aan earlier posting, it would be helpful if some PramaaNams 
from our scriptures could be cited in support of the scientific explanations.
Moderator
===============================================================================


--- In SriRangaSri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Maya Iyengar <maya_s1717@xxxx> 
wrote:
> I wish to hear from fellow devotees their opinion about this and 
the reasons for use of lime stone and wood in some temples. What do 
aagamaas say about the choice of granite and other substances? 
> Regards,
> Maya.


Dear member,

The forwarded article is very interesting. If the experiments 
described are true, we now have at hand a sound (pun un-intended) 
scientific justification for idolatry.

But it also makes one wonder about another thing.

If the granite inside the sanctum is so very important -- in terms 
of 'pH factor', 'acoustic' and 'ionic' conductivity etc. etc. -- then 
perhaps the time has come for us to  leave the 'moolavar-vigraham-s' 
in our temples alone? Perhaps, we should no more 
overburden 'moolavars' with all manner of "aabharaNam-s" (jewellery 
of gold, diamond, precious gemstones, what not)? Surely, all the 
heavy jewellery covering the idol (head-to-foot as in some of our 
temples) must be negatively interfering with, why even diminishing, 
all the positive energy the granite is said to generate?

Can scientific-minded members please throw some light?

Thanks and regards,

dAsan,
Sudarshan 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/VkWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SriRangaSri/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    SriRangaSri-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
srirangasri-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list