You are here: SriPedia - SriRangaSri - Archives - Jul 2004

SriRangaSri List Archive: Message 00241 Jul 2004

 
Jul 2004 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear Devotees,

As Shri Jayasree rightly pointed out, it is better if we won't think
emotionally but instead refer shruti, smritis and acharya's siddhanthas to
arrive at a correct answer as that is the right way and which is called as
brahma jignasa/miimamsa.  That way, there won't be any feeling of
guilty(apacharam)also, that dog our mind time and again when we voice
opinions for/against Parabrahman and His Beloved.

However, I as a reader, has been enjoying thoroughly reading various
mails/extracts drawn from Ramayana and especially the below one in which Sri
Acharya's advise is followed to the tee to give explanations on various
topics within Ramayana.  Please continue the ordeal and it would be better
if both the parties quote profusely shrutis / upanishads to substantiate
their opinions.

I thank the Moderator who is very tolerant and allowing mails on this topic.


Sukumar

-----Original Message-----
From: jasn sn [mailto:jayasartn@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 12:11 AM
To: tiruvenkatam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; oppiliappan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
SriRangaSri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: sadagopaniyengar; sudarshan madabushi
Subject: [SriRangaSri] Piratti's ordeal and Reply from SriRama to my
letter


SRIMATHE RAMANUJAYA NAMAHA.

Dhyaanam:-
 Anbu, aazhiyaanai aNugu ennum,
naa, avan than paNbu, aazhi, thoL paravi yetthu ennum,
munbu voozhi kaaNaanai-k-kaaN ennum kaN,
sevi kEL ennum
pooNaram poondan pughzh.  (Poigaiaazhwaar)

Dear devotees,
Kindly excuse me for interfering in the discussion on
Pirattis agni pravesham at this stage, for if I
dont, I would  be committing an offence of not
speaking up when it was my mail which was the cause of
the round of discussions currently taking place and
not what Sri Sadagopan Iyengar has thought (that Sri
Narasimhans salvo was a sequel to his write up). Mr
Narasimhan sent a cc of his  mail to me on this issue
as a sequel to my post An open letter to Sri Rama
apparently in a bid to educate me on the kinds of
dosham that Sita Piratti had, but missed in the
process the perspective which I wished the reader to
see the perspective being  Rama can not be faulted
for any mis-demeanor, so also Sita. When Rama (as
Vishnu in avathara krama) had apparently intended to
place Himself and Piratti  in such worst conditions,
what was the need to do so? Why didnt He do it by
some other way that could have spared themselves,
particularly Sita of the hardships they had to
undergo?





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/VkWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SriRangaSri/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    SriRangaSri-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
srirangasri-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list