You are here: SriPedia - SriRangaSri - Archives - Jul 2004

SriRangaSri List Archive: Message 00263 Jul 2004

 
Jul 2004 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear shri Sudarshan,

This is in reply to Part I of your posting.

Knowing the public prosecutor to be an impressive and eloquent advocate, the 
Defence had expected much more solid arguments from him. In fact, the 
prosecution's submission so far has hardly been able to even scrape at the 
concrete wall of the defence arguments, leave alone knock a hole in the same.

The by-now "famous" line, "If Rama did it, it must be correct!" appears to 
stand unassailed, despite the prosecution's attempts to demolish it.
 
I would appeal to the amicus curae and members of the jury to note very 
carefully the adept way in which the prosecutor has shifted the scene from the 
Agni pariksha, to Uttara Kandam. I would like to emphasize very much and 
repeatedly, that the case we have on hand concerns Sri Rama's conduct on the 
occasion of Sri Sita's ordeal by fire and is not at all about Her being 
abandoned in the woods. I pray to the  jury not to be misled by counsel's 
skilful attempts to shift the focus from Agni pariksha, where he finds not any 
text to support him,  to the Uttara Kandam episode. 

Members of the jury and Amicus curae, it is a basic principle of jurisprudence 
that one must argue one's case on the basis of available facts pertaining to 
the instant case alone, and not bring in material irrelevant to the same, 
simply because no tenable arguments can be adduced for the current case. If we 
are talking about Agni Pariksha, we will continue to do so. If we are to talk 
about the Uttara Kanda, we will do so separately and not mix up things merely 
for our convenience. 

Having cautioned members of the jury against these diversionary tactics, I 
would like to point out that even the texts quoted by the learned prosecutor 
hardly afford him the requisite degree of support. All these slokas pertain 
strictly to Piratti's plight in the woods in the Uttara Kanda, with the Agni 
Pariksha episode hardly figuring in them, unless such a "spin" is put on the 
impartial Maharshi's words.

And I draw the jury's attention to the careful way in which the prosecutor has 
avoided all reference to the Sundara Kanda sloka of Piratti. If you want to 
listen to the true Voice of Sita Piratti, placed in context, it is to be found 
in Her admission of guilt to Siriya Tiruvadi--

"Mamaiva dushkritam kinchit, mahadasti na samsaya:"

Why doesn't the prosecutor take cognisance of this plain text which is 
incapable of embellishment or misinterpretation?
In fact, Sri Mythily emphasises Her admission with the words, "na 
samsaya:"(undoubtedly). It is natural that the prosecutor disregards this, for, 
if he were to admit the same, it would lay clear to all the truth that the 
Public Prosecutor is arguing a case he has dreamed up on his own, with 
absolutely no basis for the same in the form of a complaint from the aggrieved 
party. Have you ever heard of a prosecution without a complaint? You have a 
bizarre instance of it here. It is a case of being more loyal than the King, 
for, can anyone in the jury or the listening public say with any element of 
certainty that Sri Sita Piratti would ever prefer a complaint against Her 
beloved?
 
 All that the much-wronged "traditionalists" have done is to identify the acts 
which Piratti Herself considers to be sins, big and small. And without such 
"traditionalists", Mr. Public Prosecutor, pray tell us where we would all be in 
the matter of finding interpretations to esoteric components of the Scripture, 
whether it be the Brahma Sutras or the Dravida Vedam? It is tradition which is 
our life line, without which all of us, irrespective of our social, economic or 
spiritial standing, would be entirely lost and floundering for the rest of our 
lives in this mundane morass, without the guiding light of scriptural wisdom. 
So there is nothing wrong, per se, with "traditionalists" and their accounts.

In sum, I am sure that members of the jury would entirely agree with me that 
the prosecution has so far been unable to prove anything and has been forced to 
resort to diversionary tactics, much in the manner of the hapless Hamilton 
Burger, the District Attorney in many of Erle Stanley Gardner's "Perry Mason" 
novels.

Let me deal with Part 2 of the Prosecution Counsel's averments later.

dasan, sadagopan


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/VkWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SriRangaSri/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    SriRangaSri-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
srirangasri-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list