[B-Greek] John 7:31, case & function of rel. pron.?
bgreek at ntresources.com
bgreek at ntresources.com
Fri Aug 1 22:17:13 EDT 2003
I've been mussing over the relative pronoun, hWN, in John 7:31. Why
is it genitive? I concluded that it is probably due to the
comparative adj. PLEIONA in the preceding phrase and is thus a
genitive of comparison (& then discovered that BDAG cites it as such,
s.v. POLUS.1.b, p. 848). But how then does hWN function in its own
clause (hWN hOUTOS EPOIHSEN;)? I assume it would have to be taken as
the dir. object of POIEW--but that seems odd to me. POIEW doesn't
normally take its D.O. in gen. case (does it?). Although P. has a
very broad semantic range, its D.O. is almost always acc. (or occas.
dat.). I don't remember P. with a gen. D.O. elsewhere, nor do I find
reference to any such use in BDAG or Wallace. (I'm at home this
evening, so I don't have access to other sources to check this
further.) The sense is clear enough; to paraphrase, "the Messiah
won't do greater signs/miracles than [the signs] that this one is
doing will he?" (Implied answer: 'no' --MH.) Any thoughts or
suggestions?
Rod Decker
Baptist Bible Seminary
Clarks Summit, PA
--
_______________________________________________________
The Deckers . . . from the mountains of NE Pennsylvania
Rod's web site: <http://faculty.bbc.edu/rdecker/>
_______________________________________________________
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list