[B-Greek] Mark 16:14, W
Harold R. Holmyard III
hholmyard at ont.com
Sat Jul 10 09:29:33 EDT 2004
Dear George,
>On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 11:28:20 +0300 Kimmo Huovila
><kimmo.huovila at helsinki.fi> writes:
>> Mark 16:14, Codex Washingtonianus
>>
>> hO MH EWN TA hUPO TWN PNEUMATWN AKAQARTA THN ALHQEIAN TOU QEOU
>> KATALABESQAI
>> DUNAMIN
>>
>> - In what sense do you take the hUPO+gen here? Under the power?
>> Caused by?
>> - How are ALHQEIA and DUNAMIS related? THN ALHQINHN DUNAMIN? THN
>> ALHQEIAN KAI
>> DUNAMIN? Or does the text make some sense without emendation?
>> - How to take KATALABESQAI? To gain control? To comprehend?
>> - Any comments on the distinciton between
>> KATALAMBANW/KATALAMBANOMAI? To what
>> degree would either form favor a particular sense for the lexeme?
>>
>> Kimmo Huovila
>> ---
>
>I'm not sure where you're getting this. According to what I see W reads
>the same as is found in NA27 (longer ending) which is quite different
>from what you present. Thinking that you might have entered an incorrect
>reference, I did a search but was unable to find your text. Perhaps you
>should check your text and your reference. I really would need to see
>this in Greek, not transliteration. The combination of KATALABESQAI with
>ALHQEIAN TOU QEOU and AKAQARTA seems strange since it could only be nom /
>acc but, as you note TWN PNEUMATWN is gen, and reminds me of Simon Magus
>in Acts though the word KATALAMBANW is not used there (the aorist mid.
>inf appears only in Eph 3.18 of the critical text -- and the Byz as
>well).
HH: What Kimmo has here matches the textual note in UBS 4.
Yours,
Harold Holmyard
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list