[B-Greek] Question about the semitic vocative
James Spinti
JSpinti at Eisenbrauns.com
Tue Dec 19 11:56:03 EST 2006
As an added argument against a Semitic vocative here: both forms are genitival, which in Semitic would mean that they are suffixed. You can't have both a definite and a suffix on a Semitic word, since the suffix makes it definite.
HTH,
James
________________________________
James Spinti
Marketing Director, Book Sales Division
Eisenbrauns, Good books for more than 30 years
Specializing in Ancient Near Eastern and Biblical Studies
jspinti at eisenbrauns dot com
Web: http://www.eisenbrauns.com
Phone: 574-269-2011 ext 226
Fax: 574-269-6788
> -----Original Message-----
> From: b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of
> George F Somsel
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 11:51 AM
> To: Octavio Rodriguez; B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: Re: [B-Greek] Question about the semitic vocative
>
>
> I tend to question that this is a case of Semitic influence.
> Even BDF which does subscribe to the view that it was a
> "Semitic vocative" notes that this tendency is present all
> the way back to Homer. I would therefore tend to think that
> this was an internal development of the Greek which certainly
> would not have been discouraged by Semitic usage. BDF § 147
> also notes that
>
> "In the NT this is the case (1) generally with adjectives
> used alone or without a substantive where the vocative is
> clear; (2) with additions of all kinds to the vocative (Attic
> SU hO PRESBUTATOS, PROCENE KAI hOI ALLOI), especially with
> participles (§412(5)) which hardly ever form the vocative.
> (3) Attic used the nominative (with article) with simple
> substantives only in addressing inferiors, who were, so to
> speak, thereby addressed in the 3rd person (Aristoph., Ra.
> 521 hO PAIS, AKOLOUQEI)."
>
> Blass, F., Debrunner, A., & Funk, R. W. (1961). A Greek
> grammar of the New Testament and other early Christian
> literature (81). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
>
>
> george
> gfsomsel
> _________
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Octavio Rodriguez <octaviors at gmail.com>
> To: B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 11:24:38 AM
> Subject: [B-Greek] Question about the semitic vocative
>
>
> I have a question about the difference of a vocative such as
> KURIE and a
> vocative such as hO KURIOS.
>
> I have read that the first belongs to the ancient greek, and
> the second is
> an influence of the the Hebrew where the article change the
> nominative to a
> vocative.
> Thus, the article here would be the signal for the vocative.
> Am i right?.
> For example in John 20:28 we reads hO KURIOS MOU KAI hO QEOS
> MOU, which
> clearly is a semitic vocative due to the article.
>
> However some people who knew greek grammar seemed not to
> see the article
> for this function, for example Cyril of Alexandria (four century)) who
> seemed to know grammar well, said about John 20:28:
>
>
> "Observe, too, that when he says *My Lord and my God, *he
> uses the article to
> show that there was One Lord and One God. For he does not say
> without the
> qualification of the article, KURIOS MOU KAI QEOS MOU*, *to
> prevent any one
> from imagining that he called Him Lord or God as he might
> have done one of
> ourselves or of the holy angels. " (Commentary on John book II)
>
> The question is if Cyril was right about the grammar or may be he was
> unaware about when we have a semitic vocative.
>
> Regards
>
> Octavio Rodriguez
> ---
> B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
> B-Greek mailing list
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> ---
> B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
> B-Greek mailing list
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
>
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list