[B-Greek] Jn 1:1 - Alternate Reading?
James Spinti
JSpinti at Eisenbrauns.com
Thu Oct 5 16:35:07 EDT 2006
That is why I asked for a grammatical argument. Both of George's
examples were pro-Nicene, but they were not based on the grammar. So, I
would say that my challenge still holds.
Do the pro-Nicene fathers or the pro-Arian fathers use the grammar as an
argument? That seems to be the foundation of all modern Arian arguments,
but the silence in the Greek speaking fathers is deafening... I still
contend that grammatically (and that is what we are supposed to be
discussing on B-Greek), Arianism was a non-starter in the 4th century.
It was a philosophical/theological argument--"there was a time when the
son was not." Not, the first verse (anachronistic, I know) of John is
grammatically indefinite, therefore the son is not God.
James
________________________________
James Spinti
Marketing Director, Book Sales Division
Eisenbrauns, Good books for over 30 years
Specializing in Ancient Near Eastern and Biblical Studies
jspinti at eisenbrauns dot com
Web: http://www.eisenbrauns.com
Phone: 574-269-2011 ext 226
Fax: 574-269-6788
> -----Original Message-----
> From: b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of
> Awohili at aol.com
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 4:26 PM
> To: b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: Re: [B-Greek] Jn 1:1 - Alternate Reading?
>
>
>
> That's what that English translation of the ANF says, but if
> Eusebius and
> Irenaeus are quoting the Greek of John's Gospel, then the
> same question arises
> with respect to Greek John 1:1c:
>
> Is it definite, indefinite, or qualitative?
>
> And obviously, respected grammarians do not agree on this matter.
>
> And I think that in quoting the philosophy of the ANF's, we
> are letting the
> theological horse ride out of the stall again....
>
> Solomon Landers
> ____________________________
> In a message dated 10/05/2006 1:14:30 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> gfsomsel at yahoo.com writes:
>
> might note that there is some question regarding Eusebius'
> orthodoxy in that
> he sometimes appeared to support the Arian party, but here
> he seems fairly
> clear when he speak of the "Word . . . which was God."
>
> george
> gfsomsel
> _________
>
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list