[B-Greek] POLLOUS hUIOUS EIS DOXAN AGAGONTA Heb. 2:10

Eric Inman eric.inman at wescorpflex.com
Wed Apr 9 06:19:44 EDT 2008


I would say that hUIOUS would be in relation to God even if TON ARCHGON were
taken with AGAGONTA.

Is there any reason why it can't or any other reason why TON ARCHGON would
not be taken with AGAGONTA?

Eric Inman

-----Original Message-----
From: b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Kline
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 3:06 AM
To: nicky_dejong at sil.org
Cc: b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [B-Greek] POLLOUS hUIOUS EIS DOXAN AGAGONTA Heb. 2:10


On Apr 8, 2008, at 9:51 PM, Nicky de Jong wrote:
> Heb. 2:10 EPREPEN GAR AUTWi, DI' hON TA PANTA KAI DI' hOU TA PANTA,  
> POLLOUS
> hUIOUS EIS DOXAN AGAGONTA TON ARCHGON THS SWTHRIAS AUTWN DIA PAQHMATWN
> TELEIWSAI.
>
> I am puzzled as to why AUTWi (God) is considered the antecedent of  
> POLLOUS
> hUIOUS EIS DOXAN AGAGONTA (irregularly modifying the dative) rather  
> than TON
> ARCHGON (Jesus). Any insights?
>
> Nicky de Jong
>


If we take TON ARCHGON with AGAGONTA, the use of hUIOUS seems to  
raise a problem, hUIOUS in relation to whom?

Elizabeth Kline


---
B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
B-Greek mailing list
B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek




More information about the B-Greek mailing list