Re: Acts 4:2 readings from D

Date: Wed Apr 30 1997 - 11:28:09 EDT

I checked our facsimile of D and the original reading was KAIAPONOUNTES, with
the cross bar on the I being an addition with a different style than that
found on the other T's. I would surmise an original reading inserting the
word divisions of KAI APONOUMENOI , but this doesn't make sense as far as the
vocabulary I've checked (LSJ). I'll be interested in what others say.

As to the citation in N/A, perhaps N/A dismissed the original reading as a
nonsense reading, but their citation of D without any note of a corrector
would seem unusual, unless thereby they are seeking not to give the
impression of a reading in D* that agrees with the text (since they don't
list the text's witnesses).

Bill Warren
Professor of New Testament and Greek
New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:14 EDT