From: Peter Phillips (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Aug 05 1997 - 09:46:09 EDT
Do you think PAN TO PLHRWMA is the subject of verse 19 or part of an
accusative+infinitive construction after EUDOKHSEN with HO QEOS supplied as
the subject of this verb?
If it is the subject what does it mean in a pre/proto-Gnostic setting?
If HO QEOS is to be supplied then why didn't [Paul] use the passive as he
has throughout the previous verses?
Cliff College, Sheffield, England
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:24 EDT