From: Carl W. Conrad (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Aug 05 1997 - 13:55:50 EDT
At 9:46 AM -0400 8/5/97, Peter Phillips wrote:
>Do you think PAN TO PLHRWMA is the subject of verse 19 or part of an
>accusative+infinitive construction after EUDOKHSEN with HO QEOS supplied as
>the subject of this verb?
I think PAN TO PLHRWMA is indeed the subject of verse 19.
>If it is the subject what does it mean in a pre/proto-Gnostic setting?
I've read extensively about this but have never been satisfied that I
understood the first thing about what it means.
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics/Washington University
One Brookings Drive/St. Louis, MO, USA 63130/(314) 935-4018
Summer: 1647 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(704) 675-4243
firstname.lastname@example.org OR email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:24 EDT