From: Jim West (email@example.com)
Date: Thu May 07 1998 - 18:51:03 EDT
At 06:42 PM 5/7/98 -0400, you wrote:
>At 04:24 PM 5/7/98 -0400, Jim West wrote:
>Hmmm... I would have needed to hear him explain more about his
>understanding of the passage at hand in context before I could render such
>judgements. Also, can we be a little friendlier and more welcoming to our
I certainly had no unfriendly tone in my voice, I assure you. And neither
do I think that direct questions need long, convoluted, inarticulate answers
which die the death of a 1000 qualifications. A direct question received a
direct answer (with an explanation, I might add). I did not intend it
harshly, nor should it be takne that way by anyone.
>>(and yes, John and 1 John are from different authors).
>Well, that's one opinion. Especially since you are responding to a 2d term
>Greek student, you may want to be clearer about the fact that there's a lot
>of disagreement about this.
Is there? Among which segment of the population? And surely if the lad is
a Greek student he has had, or is taking, some introduction to the NT
course. Surely he has not been shielded from such evils as rhetorical
criticism or historical criticism, has he?
Jim West, ThD
Quartz Hill School of Theology
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:42 EDT