From: George Blaisdell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jun 03 1999 - 14:26:22 EDT
>From: "Carl W. Conrad"
>At 8:51 AM -0700 6/3/99, George Blaisdell wrote:
> >>From: "Donald L. Shaffer"
> >>It now seems clear to me that I need only research
> >>that combination of EIMI and PROS.
> >So when John 1:1 has
> >hO LOGOS HN PROS TON QEON, we can assume on >this approach that it
> >means relationship, where hO LOGOS is TO in the >formulation, and TON
> >TI, and the HN is the very implied stative verb >of existence in TO PROS
> >I hope this is helpful.
>No, the text does NOT say hO LOGOS HN TO PROS QEON EINAI. And that is what
>it would have to say to yield the meaning you're suggesting.
Well, so much for my hope for helpfulness! It sure looks like a dead ringer
for relationship, Carl, but if you say it's not, then it's not!
>The rest of this is theological speculation, which really doesn't belong on
Sorry for the cross-over.
>Take it to your
???MY??? I think it's Edgar's ~ I just chime in...
>"Theology of the Greek Bible" list where such speculation appears to be
>right at home
>in that current thread with the newly coined term, QEWSIS.
OW! OW! OW!
Carl, a whuppin' from you is better than praise from most anybody!
>Please, let's keep theological speculation off
>of this list.
I'll do better, I promise!
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [email@example.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:29 EDT